Growth on a Finite Planet

This Castle Debates session examined whether continued economic growth is compatible with a finite planet, finite natural resources and the limits set by planetary boundaries. The discussion brought together perspectives from policy, economics, international development and business to explore what “prosperity” could look like under ecological constraints. It also considered the implications for decision-making by governments, businesses and individuals, given the scale and urgency of the challenge.

• Overview

  This session explored the relationship between economic growth and environmental limits, and what alternatives or reforms may be needed to achieve wellbeing within planetary boundaries. Discussion focused on competing definitions of progress, how economic systems can account for natural capital and resource constraints, and what this means for policy and business models.

  Key questions

  • Is continued economic growth compatible with planetary boundaries and finite natural resources?

  • How should we define progress and prosperity if growth is constrained or undesirable?

  • What do “post-growth” and “degrowth” approaches mean in practice for policy and society?

  • How can governments and institutions account for ecological limits in economic decision-making?

  • What would regenerative business models require to scale in real-world markets?

• Speakers and chair

  Speakers

  • Bob Ward — Policy and Communications Director, LSE Grantham Institute

  • Emma River-Roberts — Degrowth Economics Expert, Post Growth Institute

  • Ayan Said — International Development and Intersectionality Consultant

  • Dan Gray — Regenerative Business Guru

  Chair

  • Micael Johnstone — Founder and Partner, Wading Herons

• Event details

  • Location: London

  • Format: Panel discussion and audience dialogue

  • Attendance: Held by prior registration

  • Schedule: Welcome and opening remarks; panel discussion and audience dialogue; audience Q&A